- The Brain is seen as the ultimate "perceiver". But who perceives the brain? The brain again? This is a circle, where my concept of circumscription comes in.
- Reality is seen as physical after all, and by "physical" our paradigm is meant. From this a limited view of information derives. Here, my infinitesimality structure suggests a deeper view from which "information" derives.
- "Physical" also means "objective", and objectivity is considered to be "not part of the observer" (the term "observer" contains this misunderstanding in itself). So where in this world is the observer? Observed by whom? Or not observed at all?
Infinitesimality structure means, that there is no object in itself.
Objects only condense from universal change by circumscription. This
change is an alternation between individuals, and these
individuals are condensations of this change, too. So neither firm
objects nor objective individuals exist. There is only change or
alternation in itself (structure of alternation).
Quantum physics describes another form of alternation than classical
physics. There seems to be a basic unity, an elementary quantum. To
perceive (or think) such a quantum, however, needs
circumscription of "it", condensation of a movement. Again, there is no
quantum in itself, although we treat it as such – and limit our focus on
it.
How then can it be circumscribed so stable? This is the question to
be asked, while not simplifying it to an object in itself (except for
practical use).
In this concept there is no exclusive observer, there are only
individual views (= individuals). Every view is unlimited at the end
(and so are the individuals), but is limited asymptotically by
self-reflection aimed at a controllable world and at building structures
at all. (A continuous plenum reflects on limited structure to define
itself.)
To view the world infinitesimality-structured means to think beyond
elementary quantum and quantum information, because "information" is
already a condensation, a permanent attuning of alternating
individuals (individual views). No information is transmitted: An
attunement takes place – by condensating a change, changing position,
and decondensating individually. The whole process is
precondensated before of course by developing a "common" language,
establishing a "common" infrastructure etc., and by unknown processes,
too.
Alternation is unlimited, because logically there cannot be a limit
without the possibility to cross it in principle. I know that logic is
thought by humans, but on the other hand thinking is seen
as an appropriate tool to relate to the bigger world. It must be so,
otherwise we would not (self-) exist in it. Although our thinking may be
inconsistent, it cannot be meaningless to the bigger
extent. Although the "ultimate" observer does not exist, individual
standpoints do exist; and so does their attunement.
Infinitesimality and infinity are consequences of limitlessness with
respect to the existent meaning of the individual thinking. They can be
well a camouflage for unperceived structures, but they
always point beyond the perceived ones and they always remain essential
values to deal with.
