If we can exist only in the constant alternation of perspective (sensory, psychic, mental) and this has to apply analogously to any place of effect (just worked, just different), how then does stability, something permanent, emerge?
Of course by repeating the alternation: of the thought, the point of view, the mutual confirmation, the effect. The alternation can be exactly repeated, however, only for an infinitely short moment; then it must reach beyond the repetition so as not to cancel itself out. That is, it changes as a whole and remains open. For stabilization an approximate repetition is sufficient, though. So for a long time we believe almost the same thing, for example.
Why, again, do we repeat ourselves at all? Because otherwise everything would disappear immediately, exist only for an infinitely short moment. But if something has gained minimal stability and thus forms a whole, it can have a further stabilizing effect, since a change with it as such now contains more repetition as well: Every alternation contains its sides, thereby "bringing" something of each side to the other. If one of them is relatively stable, the other is "addressed" again and again in a similar way and thus "seduced" to permanence. Or it loses connection eventually.
In the so-called "matter" it doesn't happen otherwise: It stabilizes itself this way in molecular interactions thus forming mountains, table and climate. Since it is nothing but small and large alternations of the place of effect, the entire alternation can be tracked in principle into the human brain and its mind - and vice versa from the mind into its brain into its environment. We find manifold intermediate stabilization of an emotional-mental, mechanical, electromagnetic, other, and unknown kind, all contributing to our relatively stable world, but never self-contained.
However, the wholeness of an alternation is, as described, a consciousness structure (see Consciousness I and Consciousness II). Consequently, we are dealing with forms of consciousness everywhere - with more or less Freedom of Choice (see there as well as Subconscious) and an increasingly unknown depth (see Awareness I and Awareness II). We live in a world of choosing consciousness or awareness. So constancy is wanted.
For example, we humans create juridical laws; animals, plants and bacteria form their own social rules; and the inter-actions of "matter" also fit into regularities, so-called "laws of nature." But the relative openness of any alternation system implies that it can change at any time with a certain degree of probability. Therefore, even "laws of nature" must be relative in some way.
Their stability in experimenting - as that of our lifeworld - is based on relatively closed "collective" reciprocal relationships. They mean the extensive exclusion of alternative paths of alternation and favor mutual "dependencies." What we believe we seek and find with greater probability, and what we find most often we believe. Again and again we change to there, with all the others who refer us to it, and displace the seemingly inappropriate "remainder". Ultimately, what is found and what is believed is inseparable and possible deviations abnormal. And by that we are even right: Our reality funnel is established.
Only of what we cannot change despite deliberate openness, we do not yet know why it opposes. On the other hand, it would be strange if we had unlimited potential with limited world knowledge - or understood our deepest intentions.