Our striving for knowledge is a declaration of love. By gaining wisdom we are loved in return. The most basic structure of consciousness and reality deciphered and a real solution to the problem of free will. Whoever distinguishes, decides. By Claus Janew.
Truthfulness. The Consciousness that Creates Reality
How Consciousness Creates Reality
Most Read
"There is no book that explains consciousness in such a clear way as it is given in this book."
Rajagopalan Madasami, India
Also in this book:
Omnipresent Consciousness and Free Will
Dynamic Existence
What is real? What is creation?
Everything is in motion. "Inertness" arises from (approximative) repetition, that is, through rotation or an alternation that delineates a focus of consciousness. This focus of consciousness, in turn, must also move/alternate (the two differ only in continuity). If its alternation seems to go too far - physically, psychically or intellectually - it reaches into the subconscious. In this way, interconnection is established by the alternation of the focus of consciousness. Therefore, in a world in which everything is interconnected, all focuses must reciprocally transition into each other. "Reality" is a common "goal", a focus which all participants can switch into and which is conscious to them as such, as a potential one. Its "degree of reality" is the probability of its fully becoming conscious (or more simply: its current degree of consciousness). Thus, a reality is created when all participants increase its probability or, respectively, their consciousness of it.Laws of Form: Why Spencer-Brown is missing the point
Radical constructivism - a hollow shell?
On focus dynamic
What are the possibilities for “paranormal” influences that would not be detected by science?
- Inspirations that could be attributed to human unpredictability,
- “Anecdotal” anomalies, because they cannot be repeated and reproduced, they are always changing,
- Incalculable complexities, because they can only be assumed to be calculable.
What Does Love Have to Do with Creativity?
Creating is an endless game of separating (projecting, i.e. changing) inner aspects in order to obtain a new individuality, which we can then rejoin (and enjoy again). A moment later we separate a new form of our infinite inner reality, and so on. We integrate all these "objects" in a new way as our awareness expands. This awareness also means going into limited experiences and coming back to the bigger "picture" that has now become more comprehensive, both consciously and subconsciously.
The Secret, happiness, right away
In the biggest
bestseller on "magical" reality creation, The Secret, the
method of attracting a desired reality is summarized in three steps:
- Ask (for something)
- Believe (that it will come)
- Receive (be ready for it)
If only it were that
simple, right? Even though the book goes into more detail: This simplified process
only works if we
- know deep down what we really want,
- have no more or less conscious conflicts overlaying it,
- are open to unexpected possibilities.
Structural Libertarianism and the Veridicality of the “Up-to-Me” Experience: Psychophysical Openness, Authored Indeterminacy, and Residual Luck
This paper defends a libertarian account of free will grounded in the phenomenological structure of live decision episodes. Such episodes instantiate an i-structure, a center–periphery organization in which a focal node represents the decision situation as a whole and a periphery represents alternatives, reasons, and constraints. There is an “up-to-me” region in which the situation’s identity is fixed while what will be done remains open. I argue that the best interpretation of this up-to-me phenomenology, when taken as serious evidence about agency, is global metaphysical openness: even given the total state of the world and the total laws at a time, more than one future action is nomically possible. I make this explicit through a strengthened Psychophysical Openness Thesis (POT): psychophysical laws are probabilistic and sensitive to i-structures, constraining and biasing outcomes without deterministically fixing them. I then define authored indeterminacy as underdetermined settling whose explanatory stopping point is the agent’s reasons-integrating act rather than an independent chancemaker. Luck objections are addressed by conceding that global libertarianism entails irreducible bruteness and chance within the agent while arguing that responsibility does not require eliminating chance but locating irreducible settling within the agent’s evaluative act.

