Can we trace back consciousness, reality, awareness, and free will to a single
basic structure without giving up any of them? This dialogue founds
consciousness and freedom of choice on the basis of a new reality concept that
also includes the infinite as far as we understand it. Just the simplest
distinction contains consciousness. It is not static, but a constant
alternation of perspectives. From its entirety and movement, however, there
arises a freedom of choice being more than reinterpreted necessity and
unpredictability. The unity and openness of the infinite enables the
individual to be creative while this creativity directly and indirectly enters
into all other individuals without impeding them.
Great Read. Thank you for putting your work out into a conscious space
for all. Much appreciated.
Marcel P. Londt, PhD, South Africa
Also in this book:
The Reality of Free Will
The uniqueness of each standpoint, each point of effect, can only be
"overcome" by the standpoint changing to other standpoints and returning. In
such alternation, which can also appear as constant change, lies the unity
of the world. The entirety of an alternation, however, is a consciousness
structure due to the special relationship between the circumscribing
periphery and the infinitesimal center. This process structure unites
determinacy and indeterminacy also totally at every place. Therefore, we are
dealing with forms of consciousness everywhere, with more or less freedom of
choice and an increasingly unknown depth. We live in a world of the choosing
consciousness or better: awareness. In this respect, our environment
expresses a deep truth about ourselves.
I am impressed by the comprehensiveness of your interdisciplinary
approach. There are some major philosophical concepts which you weave
very well into a necessary system of reality: potential, the one and the
many, alternation, constant change, the reality and uniqueness of
oneiric experience and the whole, interdependence, infinity, the mandate
of opposites and many more. The combination of these ideas cannot be
attributed solely to any other of the established classical and modern
thinkers of whom I am aware. I thank you for your enlightenment.
E W Ralph, UK